equal treatment

Findings of three recent reports support a common conclusion: Vote "No" on Amendment 46

Type: Commentary & Letters
Published Date: October 17, 2008
Author: Waterous, Frank

(Emailed to supporters, submitted as op-ed)

By Frank Waterous

Proponents of Amendment 46 maintain that by prohibiting governments from showing preferential treatment, they are righting a wrong because such treatment is "discriminatory, divisive and ineffective."

Their argument is that if everyone is treated equally, then everyone is equal. That's a noble thought and has a feel-good quality to it.

Syndicate content